Archive for June, 2008

Let them eat stimulus checks

June 19, 2008

Instead of the good old Keynesianism we need– long-term government investment in projects to make the nation energy independent, a masive overhaul of the nation’s public transportation system and electricial grid, dramatic public works and incentives to remake the country from suburban sprawl to small towns and cities surrounded by productive farmland, incubating green businesses, and other things that need to be done anyway and which private industry can’t or won’t do–, each of us gets a couple hundred bucks in the mail and are told to… GO SHOPPING!

“Sure, I know you’re malnourished and need hearty, filling, nutritious food, over the long term, in order to return to healthful self-sufficiency… so here’s a little candy bar right now with lots of sugar. Be sure to eat it right away.”

Pathetic. Insulting. Completely backwards. So out of touch as to be condescending without even trying to be. Marie Antoinette calls out from the balcony in Crawford, Texas, “let them eat stimulus checks”.

Obama and diplomacy

June 18, 2008

I read with humor the recent backroom negotiations Obama is having with Clinton’s donors and supporters. I view it as a great test of his leadership and diplomacy. If he’s able to get the big-dollar Clinton supporters on board, and unify the Democrats (isn’t that like herding cats?) then I think it’ll show that he’s got what it takes to unify the whole country, and negotiate with world leaders and corporate honchos and heads of state.

Girls and math

June 7, 2008

After volunteering in the schools, I noticed that girls do not perform nearly as well at math as boys do. It’s a statistically-significant difference, at least in the small samples I’ve been working with.

After studying it a bit more, I’m convinced that it is entirely cultural and has nothing to do with biology. Correlation does not infer causality.

There is, however, something that boys are definitely culturally (and perhaps biologically) predisposed to, that girls aren’t, and which more than adequately explains their proficiency at math: team sports, particularly the pro-level spectator variety.

If you are a kindergardener or first-grader who loves watching NBA basketball, you are counting by 2’s and 3’s up to and often over 100, nearly every night. You are also calculating differences between scores, on the fly, every few seconds. If you love NFL football, you as a young child are adding by 7’s, 3’s, 2’s, and 1’s, all day every Sunday and as late on Monday night as your parents will let you stay up. If you love baseball, you are adding and subtracting every night too, and also calculating percentages and ratios. Plus every morning in the newspaper you are poring over columns of numbers. Eagerly. Out of pure love of the game.

Anything you do a lot of, and love doing, you will become skilled at. I knew a few girls when I was a schoolkid who were very good at math– they also enjoyed playing a lot of card games.

My daughter does not like sports, or card games, but she is very competitive, and it drove her nuts that the boys were so far ahead of her at math. After finding some math games that she enjoyed, she worked on it and now she’s completing assignments at pretty close to their level. I hated sports as a kid, and still do, and I was always way behind the other boys at math (and still am). I didn’t develop any proficiency at math until the Apple ][ was invented and I got one and started programming computers. A few years ago, when playing around with embedded programming and device drivers, I could add and subtract in base 16, and to this day I can still rattle off powers of 2 from 0 to 65536.